Re: Will Netscape eat itself?

jcam@internos.com
Fri, 6 Oct 1995 10:11:31 -0700


On Thu, 5 Oct 1995, "Internet Marketing discussion list"
<internet-marketing@popco.com> wrote:
<i>>From: bergman@everyday.se (Anders Bergman)</i>
<i>></i>
MS domination (and attitude) in many
<i>>areas makes more and more people, all else being equal, prefer a non-MS</i>
<i>>product. Overtaking Netscapes 70% share isn't that easy, not even for MS.</i>

I think we have to remind ourselves that that 70% is for still pretty small
market penetration. The real battle is just shaping up, and the 70% could
evaporate significantly over a matter of months.

It's way too early to declare any winners, and by now it should
be clear that predicting the future when it comes to the Internet
is just about impossible. And who knows, Microsoft could just
end up consuming Netscape in one little gulp!

Incidentally, the 70% Netscape figure is just about as prevelant
as the 35 million Internet users. Is it any better supported?

Regards,

J. Cameron

______________________________

James Cameron Internet Training, Seminars and Consultation
Internos, Inc
Seattle, WA Upcoming:
ph 206 789 4831 "The Lawyer on the Internet"
jcam@internos.com The Washington State Convention and Trade Center
December 6, 1995

----
This week's sponsor:
Marketing to Women Online Conference &amp;lt;&lt;a href="<a href="http://kelseygroup.com/kelsey">http://kelseygroup.com/kelsey</a>"&gt;http://kelseygroup.com/kelsey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;

Talk with Mary Morris on Tuesday, Oct. 10, at 4 pm Pacific/7 pm Eastern
over the Internet using GlobalStage/GlobalChat software. See
&amp;lt;&lt;a href="<a href="http://www.popco.com/hyper/internet-marketing/chat.html">http://www.popco.com/hyper/internet-marketing/chat.html</a>"&gt;http://www.popco.com/hyper/internet-marketing/chat.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; for details



Return to top-level of current discussion

Return to Internet Marketing Home Page


Search the archives

Enter keywords



Post a message to this group by filling in the form below.

From:
Subject:
In reply to: